JSLINQ Forum Rss Feed

New Post: Select calls clause function twice

crpietschmann — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:06:34 GMT

Thanks. This has been fixed.

New Post: A Better Query Tool Than jQuery?

crpietschmann — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:59:02 GMT

I just added (in v2.10) a plugin model to JSLINQ that is similar to JQuery via adding methods to "JSLINQ.fn". If you are interested in adding your own plugins to JSLINQ, there is a simple example located within the release download.

New Post: Select calls clause function twice

cshipley — Sun, 10 May 2009 16:10:00 GMT

Out of curiosity, in the Select method, why not call the clause function once, then if the result evaluates to true, add it to the array? This would roughly double performance of select.

So, from:

for (var i = 0; i < this.items.length; i++) {
if (clause(this.items[i])) {
newArray[newArray.length] = clause(this.items[i]);
}
}

To this:

for (var i = 0; i < this.items.length; i++) {

var result = clause(this.items[i]);
if (result)
newArray[newArray.length] = result;
}

-- Curtis

New Post: JSLINQ better approach

crpietschmann — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:38 GMT

I would be interested in seeing the code you wrote if you're willing to share it. Please post it somewhere and post a link here. Thanks.

New Post: JSLINQ better approach

galsoftware — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:51:42 GMT

Hello. I think I have a much better approach about how to implement a LINQ-like library in javascript. First of all, remember that you must define functions to give the option for joining multiple arrays. (inner join, left join, right join). I just started coding my library, and after I wrote more then 80K of code i found your library on codeplex. But I AM SURE that my library is far more better than yours. I use lambda expressions, FULL LINQ-like syntax, I have "groupping", "having", "Inner/Left/Right JOIN", etc :) If anybody is interested about my library you can write to me at aurelian.lica (at) gmail.com

New Post: JSLINQ and LIKE Operation?

crpietschmann — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:02:10 GMT

JSLINQ doesn't include a LIKE operator since that is really something that needs to be done within the Where method anyway. In order to perform a LIKE operation, you'll need to place the logic for it within the clause (or closure) that you pass the Where method.

New Post: No client side dependency

crpietschmann — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:57:46 GMT

JSLINQ.js is completely self contained. It requires no other JavaScript Frameworks on the client, and works cross-browser. Also since it is a JavaScript library, it does not have any dependence on the .NET Framework.

New Post: No client side dependency

dc — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:09:20 GMT

does JSLINQ.js have any client side dependency to dotnet framework being present on the client machine ? I am quite hopeful it does not , this just to clarify.
Thanks for taking a read into this.

New Post: JSLINQ and LIKE Operation?

shoaibshaikh — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:53:16 GMT

Did JSLINQ support 'Like' operation? if yes can anyone give any idea how to use it?

NEW POST: A Better Query Tool Than jQuery?

crpietschmann — Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:24:04 GMT

If you have any ideas for functionality for JSLINQ, feel free to submit them to the Issue Tracker; along with any code demonstrating them. And, if they make sense for the scope of this project, I'll incorporate them into the project.

Currently, CodePlex is the only home page for this project, I'm thinking about creating a site dedicated to it. It is a great idea to create a section where others can post JSLINQ Extensions. I just created an Extensions tag in the Discussion forums, so just post any code for Extensions there for the time being. If it becomes popular enough with people posting their own JSLINQ extensions I'll create an Extensions section on the projects website, once I create it.

Thanks for the suggestions!

NEW POST: Script and LINQ

NikhilK — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:14:48 GMT

Nice - Just thought I'd post a link to a post I did a while back demonstrating LINQ concepts in script - http://www.nikhilk.net/ScriptAndLINQ.aspx.
Also, script# supports these APIs as well, as mentioned in the post.

NEW POST: A Better Query Tool Than jQuery?

stimpy77 — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:27:04 GMT

JSLINQ is a really interesting idea, by the way.

NEW POST: A Better Query Tool Than jQuery?

stimpy77 — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:23:17 GMT

I take it this can run in the browser (Firefox, Opera, etc).

Is it inherently extensible like jQuery is? jQuery's extensibility seems to be more of a service than a feature since Javascript objects are all extensible; is there a home page for JSLINQ where jQuery-like extensions can be featured?

For that matter, what about appending jQuery object with JSLINQ's object definition so that jQuery extensions "just work" with JSLINQ? :D